<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Herman Bavinck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hermanbavinck.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hermanbavinck.org</link>
	<description>online collection of news, books, articles, and audio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:21:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Free Articles by Jordan Barrett</title>
		<link>http://hermanbavinck.org/articles/#comment-1409</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jordan Barrett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bavinck.wordpress.com/articles/#comment-1409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A heads up - Ron Gleason&#039;s article on Justification is now a dead link.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A heads up &#8211; Ron Gleason&#8217;s article on Justification is now a dead link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Free Articles by Umer Nawaz</title>
		<link>http://hermanbavinck.org/articles/#comment-1372</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Umer Nawaz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bavinck.wordpress.com/articles/#comment-1372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice Free Articles by Bavinck]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice Free Articles by Bavinck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Willem J. de Wit</title>
		<link>http://hermanbavinck.org/about/#comment-1201</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Willem J. de Wit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 10:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New book with two chapters and an appendix on Bavinck:
download for free or order through: http://willemjdewit.wordpress.com/english 

On the Way to the Living God: A Cathartic Reading of Herman Bavinck and an Invitation to Overcome the Plausibility Crisis of Christianity (Amsterdam: VU University Press, 2011), x + 208 pages, ISBN 978 90 8659 586 0]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New book with two chapters and an appendix on Bavinck:<br />
download for free or order through: <a href="http://willemjdewit.wordpress.com/english" rel="nofollow">http://willemjdewit.wordpress.com/english</a> </p>
<p>On the Way to the Living God: A Cathartic Reading of Herman Bavinck and an Invitation to Overcome the Plausibility Crisis of Christianity (Amsterdam: VU University Press, 2011), x + 208 pages, ISBN 978 90 8659 586 0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Biography by My list of Calvinists for the non-Calvinist &#171; Churchmouse Campanologist</title>
		<link>http://hermanbavinck.org/biography/#comment-1003</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[My list of Calvinists for the non-Calvinist &#171; Churchmouse Campanologist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bavinck.wordpress.com/biography/#comment-1003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Herman Bavinck [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Herman Bavinck [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Free Audio by Two Kingdoms and Kuyperian Theology, a summary and critique by John Bolt &#171; thereformedmind</title>
		<link>http://hermanbavinck.org/lectures/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Two Kingdoms and Kuyperian Theology, a summary and critique by John Bolt &#171; thereformedmind]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 20:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bavinck.wordpress.com/?page_id=49#comment-766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  Here is the pdf of the article and here is a link to the audio of the debate (scroll down to it halfway down the page; real audio format) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Here is the pdf of the article and here is a link to the audio of the debate (scroll down to it halfway down the page; real audio format) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Review of Gleason&#8217;s Bavinck Biography by Dane Ortlund&#8217;s Review of Herman Bavinck by Ronald Gleason &#171; Blogmatics</title>
		<link>http://hermanbavinck.org/2011/01/11/a-review-of-gleasons-bavinck-biography/#comment-602</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dane Ortlund&#8217;s Review of Herman Bavinck by Ronald Gleason &#171; Blogmatics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 14:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hermanbavinck.org/?p=242#comment-602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] [Read the rest here.] [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Read the rest here.] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reformed Dogmatics, Abridged by Dave K</title>
		<link>http://hermanbavinck.org/2011/05/12/reformed-dogmatics-abridged/#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave K]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 22:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hermanbavinck.org/?p=248#comment-601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the question is, should the reader looking for an introduction to Bavinck now start here or with Our Reasonable Faith?

As an expert, how would you compare the two?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the question is, should the reader looking for an introduction to Bavinck now start here or with Our Reasonable Faith?</p>
<p>As an expert, how would you compare the two?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trueman on Bavinck by Is Bavinck Relevant for Today? &#8211; Justin Taylor</title>
		<link>http://hermanbavinck.org/2011/05/20/trueman-on-bavinck/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is Bavinck Relevant for Today? &#8211; Justin Taylor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 13:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hermanbavinck.org/?p=252#comment-599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to Tony Reinke for digging up Carl Trueman&#8217;s June 2000 editorial for Themelios (not previously online) on [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Tony Reinke for digging up Carl Trueman&#8217;s June 2000 editorial for Themelios (not previously online) on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bavinck on Justification by Justification &#171; Andrew Groves</title>
		<link>http://hermanbavinck.org/2011/04/06/bavinck-on-justification/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justification &#171; Andrew Groves]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 01:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hermanbavinck.org/?p=245#comment-592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] source: Dane Ortlund after several moths of pondering Herman Bavinck’s writings on justification. His attempt at a single (run-on) sentence articulating Bavinck’s view. http://hermanbavinck.org/2011/04/06/bavinck-on-justification/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] source: Dane Ortlund after several moths of pondering Herman Bavinck’s writings on justification. His attempt at a single (run-on) sentence articulating Bavinck’s view. <a href="http://hermanbavinck.org/2011/04/06/bavinck-on-justification/" rel="nofollow">http://hermanbavinck.org/2011/04/06/bavinck-on-justification/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Biography by What Kind of Evangelical Are You? Thoughts on Different Ways To Love the Church (Part Five) &#171; Reformed and Always Reforming</title>
		<link>http://hermanbavinck.org/biography/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What Kind of Evangelical Are You? Thoughts on Different Ways To Love the Church (Part Five) &#171; Reformed and Always Reforming]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 10:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bavinck.wordpress.com/biography/#comment-588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Herman Bavinck, the great Dutch Reformed theologian, in discussing this doctrine says, &#8220;Another important attribute that the Reformation ascribed to Scripture in opposition to Rome was perspicuity or clarity.  According to Rome, Scripture is unclear (Reformed Dogmatics, Prolegomena, Volume One, 475, italics my own).&#8221;  It is necessary to keep in mind the context in which this doctrine arose as we go on to define it more clearly, because it helps us to understand what the Reformers were attempting to achieve with it.  Bavinck goes on, &#8220;It (the doctrine of clarity) does not mean that the matters and subjects with which Scripture deals are not mysteries that far exeed the reach of the human intellect.  Nor does it assert that Scripture is clear in all its parts, so that no scientific exegesis is needed&#8230; (477).&#8221;  This is where the recent confusion has come into play in relation to the doctrine.  Some Protestant Christians would posit that Scripture is in all parts clear, that all matters of faith and practice alike are easily accessible to the reader of Scripture. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Herman Bavinck, the great Dutch Reformed theologian, in discussing this doctrine says, &#8220;Another important attribute that the Reformation ascribed to Scripture in opposition to Rome was perspicuity or clarity.  According to Rome, Scripture is unclear (Reformed Dogmatics, Prolegomena, Volume One, 475, italics my own).&#8221;  It is necessary to keep in mind the context in which this doctrine arose as we go on to define it more clearly, because it helps us to understand what the Reformers were attempting to achieve with it.  Bavinck goes on, &#8220;It (the doctrine of clarity) does not mean that the matters and subjects with which Scripture deals are not mysteries that far exeed the reach of the human intellect.  Nor does it assert that Scripture is clear in all its parts, so that no scientific exegesis is needed&#8230; (477).&#8221;  This is where the recent confusion has come into play in relation to the doctrine.  Some Protestant Christians would posit that Scripture is in all parts clear, that all matters of faith and practice alike are easily accessible to the reader of Scripture. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

